|
Barbara Sinclair of Brooksville, Fla. and son Dean Whitcomb march in the St. Pete Pride parade representing the Hernando County chapter of PFLAG. Photo by Laura Herrera |
Because of Monday’s lecture, I began to think about what is worth telling through multimedia.
After watching the MediaStorm piece,
A Thousand More,
it is really hard to imagine anything I might work on in J2150 as
significant in comparison to the story of 9-year-old Philip Mayer who
has Spinal Muscular Atrophy. But I'm working towards it.
I have a guilty pleasure when it comes to anything wedding related. From alternative wedding blogs, like
Offbeat Bride, to ‘Say Yes to the Dress,’ I love seeing weddings come together. One of my favorite indulgences is the
New York Times’ Vows section.
NYT
Vows is basically soon-to-be-wed couples telling the stories of how
they found each other. While these are beautifully put together
multimedia stories (I wouldn’t expect anything less from the New York
Times), I’d categorize them as fairly insignificant. How does a couple
getting married compare to the unique story of Philip Mayer?
While
it would be unreasonable to ever compare the two, I realized NYT Vows
does inadvertently add important social commentary when it comes to
sharing the stories of queer* couples.
Most wedding coverage is
really hetero-normative. It’s rare, though not unheard of, to see queer
couples featured on mainstream wedding shows. NYT Vows is not only more
proportional in the population they feature, but because queer couples
are able to share their own stories they have the ability to politicize
their story as much or as little as they want.
Interestingly
enough, every story of a queer couple I have watched has included a political
reference. Some talk in-depth about how they never imagined marriage
would be a legal reality for them. For others, it is as simple as “Thank
you, Governor Cuomo.” This shows the unique cultural environment queer
relationships form under in the United States.
To me, that seems pretty significant.
*Queer in this context is used as an umbrella term for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and other identities.